 |
| GSO Home |
| About
GSO |
| Conductor/Music Director |
| Associate Conductor |
| Orchestra |
| Meet the Musicians |
| Administration |
| GSO in Greenwich Schools |
| Concerts |
| October
3-4, 2009 |
| November 21-22, 2009 |
| January
30-31, 2010 |
| March
13-14, 2010 |
| April
17-18, 2010 |
| Tickets and Subscriptions |
| Young People's Concerts |
| Chamber Players |
| October
18-19, 2009 |
| November
15-16, 2009 |
| Feb
28 & Mar 1, 2010 |
| March
28-29, 2010 |
| Tickets
& Subscriptions |
| Benefit
Concert & Party |
Wine &
Cheese Festival
Friday, October 16, 2009 |
| Symphony Soirée |
| Directions |
|
 |
January
30
- 31, 2010
Schubert
Symphony No. 8 ''Unfinished''
Vieuxtemps
Violin Concerto No. 5
Edita
Orlinyte,
Violin
Dvořák
Symphony No. 8
|
 |
|
Edita Orlinyte,
Violin |
|
Lithuanian-born
violinist Edita Orlinyte has performed throughout
most European countries and Japan. Since coming to
the U.S. in 1996, she has played regularly with the
Greenwich Symphony and has continued her solo career
with recitals in New York, Chicago and Boston. In
2008, she made her Carnegie Hall debut. In addition
to chamber music and solo works, Ms. Orlinyte's
repertoire includes over 20 violin concertos.
''Orlinyte's
interpretation brought both passion and
intelligence to the table.''
– New York
Concert Review
Program Notes
Symphony No. 8 in B
minor, ''Unfinished''
Franz Schubert (1797-1828)
Franz Schubert’s Symphony No. 8 has attained an
esteemed position in the repertoire, and yet it is
unfinished, with only two movements. Why it was
never completed with the standard four movements is
one of the unsolved mysteries in the classical music
world. There have been, of course, various
explanations. The highly regarded music critic and
analyst Sir Donald Tovey (1875-1940) wrote that
''the remainder (referring to two final movements)
did not drive Schubert to the labor of writing it
down.'' Schubert scholar Martin Chusid suggests that
Schubert left many works unfinished during the
period (circa 1822) that he composed this symphony.
Teacher and critic Michael Steinberg wrote, ''The
most convincing explanation is that he was at a loss
how to go on.'' Considering that the critical Tovey
referred to the two completed movements as ''the
most perfect of Schubert’s large instrumental
works,'' Steinberg’s argument deserves
consideration.
The first movement is a masterful example of the use
of contrasting themes. Schubert was a supreme
composer of melody, as evidenced by his large number
of beloved art songs and chamber pieces. His
melodies are unmatched in their dramatic
effectiveness. As a symphonist, however, and
particularly in this symphony, his melodies are not
only memorable and affecting but they are also
constructed in such a way as to provide smaller
elements derived from them, and these elements are
used throughout the first movement. This provides a
foundation of unity and flow, and at the same time,
the ear is refreshed by the variety and contrasting
treatments of the melodic elements.
In particular, the themes in the first movement
offer a contrast between pathos and beauty, and this
provides the dramatic basis for the entire movement.
The pathos is heard in the slow opening lower string
passage, quickly followed by a keening melody in
clarinet and oboe. This first theme is cast in B
minor, which lends the music its dark, somber
character. Soon, however, after an emphatic finish
and a long note in horns, Schubert introduces the
second theme with a harmonic change to the
brightness of G major, and a melody, so well known,
of great beauty, played by cellos. This is the
contrast between pathos and beauty, and these
subjects are heard in various treatments throughout
the development and recapitulation. The opening
statement is played once again in a coda, which ends
with strong, accented chords.
The second movement, Andante con moto, offers
respite from the more frequent emotional climaxes
occurring in the first. Tranquil, quiet passages of
exquisite beauty come forth in two themes, the first
of which is played by high strings after a gentle
two measure introduction with descending plucked
lower strings. The transition to the second theme is
an ethereal, otherworldly sound that leads to solo
clarinet, then oboe, singing a melody of plaintive
beauty over an accompaniment of quiet syncopation.
All is not quiet, however, as stormy passages
interrupt the serenity, but the earlier mood returns
with both melodies played in the gentleness of the
quiet conclusion.
Violin Concerto No. 5 in A minor, ''Grétry,'' Op.
37
Henry Vieuxtemps (1820-1881)
Born in Belgium, violinist Henry Vieuxtemps was
a child prodigy who became one of the great
19th-century virtuosos, a group fostered by the
phenomenal master of the violin, Niccolň Paganini
(1782-1840). Virtuoso concertos of this era, for
both violin and piano, were inspired by Paganini’s
incredible technique and musicianship. Succeeding
him, Vieuxtemps, along with Viotti, Spohr,
Wieniawski, Bruch, Joachim, Sarasate and Lalo,
composed and performed significant 19th-century
violin concertos that have remained in the
repertoire. Vieuxtemps’s seven concertos are
particularly valued for adding new dimensions of
dignity, richness and musicality to the technical
display heard in these pieces.
The Concerto No. 5 has three movements that are
musically joined into one extended piece. The first
movement begins with an orchestral exposition of
melodies, followed by the soloist’s entrance with a
lovely ascending passage, leading to more themes
characterized by lyricism and virtuosity. The
development explores many of the melodies and more
technical display, and an inventive cadenza follows.
The second movement Adagio presents beautiful,
eloquent, flowing themes, one of which Vieuxtemps
borrowed from an opera by A.E.M. Grétry (1741-1813),
thus giving the concerto its name. A brief third
movement, Allegro con fuoco, concludes the concerto
with spirit and virtuosic flair.
Symphony No. 8 in G Major, Op. 88
Antonín Dvořák (1841-1904)
The warm, lyrical and nationalistic quality of
Dvořák’s Symphony No. 8 is striking, and for good
reason. Dvořák was an optimist, and success with his
career had reached a high level. The symphony was
composed in three months in the fall of 1889, a time
when his music was in demand in Europe, Britain and
the United States, and he was enjoying a nice
income. In particular during that beautiful fall
season, he was happy, living in his country cottage
in Vosaká, surrounded by his six children, and
walking in his beloved Bohemian countryside, away
from the stress of the city. It was a setting that
inspired his rich melodic creativity and greatly
influenced the character of this symphony. The first
performance took place in February, 1890, in Prague,
with the composer conducting the Prague National
Theater Orchestra.
Much of the style of Dvořák’s music can be explained
by his upbringing in Bohemia and his exposure to the
music that played such an important role in the
lives of the people. He was captivated by the
essence of the folk melodies, rhythms and harmonies
he played and heard, and the result was that his own
music was imbued with those qualities. It is
important to note, however, that Dvořák did not use
direct quotes from folk music, but rather captured
the spirit and the flavor of it with his own
creative writing. But capture it he surely did, and
this accounts for the appeal so much of his music
has throughout the world.
It is known that at this time Dvořák was not content
with following usual sonata form rules; with this
symphony, he used different devices. He begins his G
major symphony with a well formed melody, not in G
major, but in the parallel G minor. (parallels share
the same letter name; relative major and minor keys
share the same key signature). After a full
treatment of this opening music, he ends it with a
sunny G major chord, and we are now in the home key
with flutes playing a bucolic, birdlike first main
theme, followed by violas and cellos. A second group
of themes recalling the composer’s Slavonic Dances
follows with more harmonic excursions, and the
exposition comes to a close. Once again we hear the
G minor opening music, anticipating that the
exposition is to be repeated. Not so, however, for
what follows instead is the development, another
surprise, and it builds to a grand climax with a
brilliant brass statement. English horn then plays
the bucolic first theme to end this section. The
recapitulation offers much variety, and the movement
ends with power and still another G minor
suggestion.
With the second movement Adagio, Dvořák composed an
extraordinary set of variations on the radiant, warm
and quite beautiful opening melody. The melody
offers rich opportunity for various contrasting
treatments, some with great strength. The final
variation, with a coda, brings the movement to a
quiet close.
A charming, lilting waltz opens the third movement,
Allegretto grazioso, in a departure from the usual
vigorous third movement scherzo. The three-part form
has a middle section that employs a melody of
delightful charm with its peasant-like, simple
loveliness.
The spirited final movement, Allegro ma non troppo,
begins with a bright trumpet fanfare, which is
followed by the main theme, a folk-like dance warmly
played by cellos. This is another theme with a set
of variations, all of which offer delightful
contrasts in tempo and brilliant, colorful
orchestration. After a final return of the original
gentle melody in cellos, the movement ends in a
blaze of full orchestral power.
– Richard Wolter
|
 |